User talk:DinoAvdic94

Welcome!

Hello, DinoAvdic94, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Daniel Bessa, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:05, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Bessa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Daniel Bessa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:05, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't looked at that article since last year - you might consider asking User:RHaworth, who deleted it most recently. He might not have noticed that the player moved up to a higher tier team.

Generally, because the article was deleted at AFD, it cannot just be recreated. But if the circumstances have changed (for instance, by the subject making his debut with a high tier team), then you can go over to Deletion Review and make your case. I'd say "This article was deleted before he made his senior level debut - but now he plays for this team, which is of the senior level, and that means he's notable, so can I have the article back please?" or something like that. I'm not familiar enough with Italian football to judge which team is which level, but I would not oppose such a request. You might also consider making a draft of the article first. Start it off at User:DinoAvdic94/Bassa Draft, so that when you do go to deletion review, you have something to show. Good luck! UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 12:40, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Olhanense Squad

Template:Olhanense Squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 21:51, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]